|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
babu_hi
New User
Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 93
|
|
|
|
I have created internal table with some key but it is not sorted based on mentioned key,why it is not sorting?
| Code: |
1 WS-HOLD-VSAM-TABLE.
05 WS-SUB1 PIC 9(03) VALUE ZEROS.
05 WS-HOLD-DATA-REC OCCURS 1 TO 100 TIMES DEPENDING ON WS-SUB1
ASCENDING KEY IS WS-CAPT-DTE-HOLD
INDEXED BY WS-SUB-INDEX.
10 WS-ACCOUNT-HOLD PIC X(34) VALUE SPACES.
10 WS-AMOUNT-HOLD PIC 9(11)V9(2) VALUE ZEROS.
10 WS-HLD-SQN-HOLD PIC 9(05) VALUE ZEROS.
10 WS-ITEM-CNTR-HOLD PIC 9(10) VALUE ZEROS.
10 WS-CAPT-DTE-HOLD PIC 9(08) VALUE ZEROS.
10 WS-FLAG-HOLD PIC X(01) VALUE SPACES.
PERFORM VARYING WS-SUB-INDEX FROM 1 BY 1
UNTIL WS-SUB-INDEX > WS-SUB1
SEARCH ALL WS-HOLD-DATA-REC
AT END
DISPLAY "DATE NOT FOUND"
WHEN WS-CAPT-DTE-HOLD(WS-SUB-INDEX) = WS-LEAST-DATE
MOVE WS-HLD-SQN-HOLD(WS-SUB-INDEX) TO WS-RTI-HLD-SQN-SAVE
MOVE WS-AMOUNT-HOLD(WS-SUB-INDEX) TO WS-RTI-AMOUNT-SAVE
MOVE 'Y' TO WS-FLAG-HOLD(WS-SUB-INDEX)
END-SEARCH
END-PERFORM. |
When i tried to use SEARCH ALL i am not getting right date? Because the table is not in sorted order. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8696
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
|
|
|
|
| You DO realize that YOU are responsible for loading the table in ascending key order, right? Merely indicating to COBOL that your table has an ascending key does not cause COBOL to load the table in that order -- it is YOUR responsibility to ensure that the table is loaded correctly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
