View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
Alexis Sebastian
New User
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 Posts: 38 Location: DC
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to fetch a date which is 3 months beofre from today's date?
For Ex, if today's date is 27/02/2010 - needs to get an output date as 27/11/2009.
Input file is FB, 80 bytes, input date starts at position 10 and ends at position 19. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shweta12j
New User
Joined: 10 May 2010 Posts: 32 Location: Mumbai
|
|
|
|
Hi ,
you can do this using DB2 in your program..
U can test the same by running below query in QMF..
SELECT DATE('27.02.2010') - 3 MONTH
FROM UU01.TMG_BUSSCNT_VERS
where UU01.TMG_BUSSCNT_VERS is a table name.
Regards,
Shweta. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skolusu
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 2205 Location: San Jose
|
|
|
|
Alexis Sebastian,
SORT products do NOT have the capability of subtracting months from a given date. If you are Ok with subtracting 90 days then I can show you a way to do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10873 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
to add my 2€
You asked for a quick and dirty solution, if You tell the exact requirement we might come up with some reasonable suggestions
the date computation rules are a bit tricky ( especially for financial related issues )
adding and subtracting months implies that the requirement is well understood and approved at the proper level
the most common issue is when the target month has less days than the current mont
for example when subtracting 1 month from march 30/31 what does Your organization expect
the common approach is to give back the LAST day of the target month
so it should give back feb 28 or feb 29 depending on the leapness of the target year
but they must be awareof the issue
Shweta.
fro a strictly technical point of view a db2 query does certainly provide the result
but is a poor practice to put a db2 dependency just for a simple date subtraction/addition |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 6966 Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
adding to enrico's comments about decent design and proper usage of tools/utilities:
1. If the date in the file is supposed to be today's date (current date),
then it was calculated, created or placed in the file somehow.
Why not calculate the second date (3 months ago) during the same process?
2. when doing date calculations with db2, and the date is external to a db2 column,
use sysibm.sysdummy1 instead of an existing user table.
then you don't have worry about authorizations and/or qualifiers.
If it will always be today's date, use CURRENT_DATE.
3. to derive the date using db2, Use the DSNTEP2 or DSNTEP4 programs to execute SQL statements dynamically.
The SYSIN can be concatenated ds (or pds members)
each containing the necessary info,
and the one which contains the date can be designated with substitution variables set within the jcl of the step, thus pointing to any date you wish.
Code: |
//SYSIN dd=hlq.mlq.llq.(mbr1), disp=shr
// dd=hlq.mlq.llq.(&mbrdte), disp=shr
// dd=hlq.mlq.llq.(mbr2), disp=shr
|
where- mbr1 contains the appropriate sql up to and including the ( preceding the date
- &mbrdte contains the date for todays run
- mbr2 contains the rest of the sql starting with the )
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10873 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
good catch Dick ! to use dsntep for producing dates
I do not have a db2 available right now...
could You please post some results...
just to see how it looks like
and to see what additional formatting should be carried along !
thank You !
cheers
enrico |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skolusu
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 2205 Location: San Jose
|
|
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer,
I would NOT recommend using DSNTEP2 or DSNTEP4 to create the dates for the following reasons
1. The output from DSNTEP2 has an LRECL of 133 bytes. You cannot override that. If you are planning to use the date created as symnames to DFSORT then it is NOT valid
2. The output from DSNTEP2 is more like a report with headers and other stuff.
I prefer using DSNTIAUL which gives you more flexibility to create data which will be used later
Kolusu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 6966 Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
Skolusu wrote: |
I prefer using DSNTIAUL which gives you more flexibility to create data which will be used later |
good point, Kolusu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|