IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

IBM Utility to copy/compress multi-volume tape files


IBM Mainframe Forums -> All Other Mainframe Topics
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:25 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

One of my current projects is to reduce the number of 3480/3490 carts used to store lots of historical data by copying multiple sets of files to eCarts (3590) media. Each file is several volumes of the older carts.

For speed's sake, we have been writing multiple copies using Syncsort.

One of the managers has heard of an "IBM Utility" that will not only copy these carts very fast, but does compression. This manager is not technical and did not mention just where he heard this.

Any idea of which utility he was told about?

If you needed to copy/consolidate a few thousand carts which utility would you choose?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:46 am
Reply with quote

In the dark and distant past I can recall using a product called CA-COPYCAT which basically copied several tape files onto one volume, maintained all of the catalog infp so that to reference the dataset was no different from as if it were on its own volume. However contention issues did arise if the volume was in use for another job.

Another method, although a little more messy, was to copy the files to DASD and then migrate to HSM which uses tapes pretty efficiently. Worked good until some darned user recalled a few biggies at the same time icon_lol.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:15 pm
Reply with quote

Hi Expat,

Thank you, kind sir.

Quote:
was to copy the files to DASD and then migrate to HSM
Unfortunately, the data is 6-10 full 3490 carts. . .<g>.

d
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Sample

Global Moderator


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8696
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:30 pm
Reply with quote

Dick, are you trying to say that ... that ... DASD isn't free??? icon_cry.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:23 pm
Reply with quote

Hi Robert,

Not only not free, but the service center (one of my clients does not have a datacenter of their own. . .) is unwilling to even talk about as much dasd as would be needed even for fee. There just isn't space/power (they say).

Of course this exercise is several hundred of these multi-gig, multi-volume datasets. . . Gee only a few terabytes is needed at a time. . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Dennis

Active Member


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 562
Location: Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:28 am
Reply with quote

If you have either TLMS or TMS from CA you can get CopyCat for free. It can stack multiple files on one output file from a VOLSER/DSN list. Very good for migrations such as yours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:44 am
Reply with quote

Hi Bill,

Not only does this system not have CA-1 or anytning similar - there is no automated tape management. . . Kinda hard to believe. . . Each client manages their own inventory locally - offline.

Yup, CopyCat would surely be welcome - used it in the past with great results.

Anyone have an rule-of-thumb as to the hardware compression rate on a 3590?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Sample

Global Moderator


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8696
Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:50 am
Reply with quote

Some of IBM's web pages for the 3590 are talking about a 3:1 compression ratio, but that would depend upon the data being put on the tape -- backups of load modules maybe less, pure data files probably more.

Great. Now I'm curious so I'll have to look at our 3590's to see what ratio we're getting. Like I don't have enough going on already! Thanks, Dick. icon_smile.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:25 am
Reply with quote

Hi Robert,

Well, i do what i can - and i believe in sharing the wealth icon_smile.gif

Quote:
backups of load modules maybe less, pure data files probably more.
No load modules, but lots of multi-format data. Some of these have more than 75% spaces. Others are variable and crammed with packed and binary values. . . Don't know if i'll be able to predict as there are quite a few different data formats. . . Whee. . . icon_razz.gif

d
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> All Other Mainframe Topics

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts Compare 2 files and retrive records f... DFSORT/ICETOOL 2
No new posts Compare 2 files(F1 & F2) and writ... JCL & VSAM 8
No new posts Write line by line from two files DFSORT/ICETOOL 7
No new posts Compare only first records of the fil... SYNCSORT 7
No new posts VB to VB copy - Full length reached SYNCSORT 8
Search our Forums:

Back to Top