Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Mainframe wiki | Quick Ref
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 
Lockdown 'DELETE GDG, FORCE' Command...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm    Post subject: Lockdown 'DELETE GDG, FORCE' Command...
Reply with quote

Hi,

Till yesterday everything was fine and, all of sudden, today they told us "'DELETE GDG, FORCE' Command" will be locked down in the LPAR I work.

When I asked them they say,
Quote:
Unfortunately, much of the IBM documentation is not very clear on the hazards of using ‘DELETE GDG FORCE’ commands. The documentation extracts below all come from z/OS v1r9 IBM manuals.

The clearest documentation on the effects of ‘DELETE GDG FORCE’ commands are found in DFSMShsm manuals. We have highlighted key statements in red.

Here is a section from the DFSMShsm Implementation and Customization Guide (p. 398):

Access Method Services DELETE GDG FORCE Command

Assume that you have a generation data group with generation data sets that have migrated, and you wish to delete the group. If you use the Access Method Services DELETE GDG FORCE command to delete the catalog entries for the generation data group and its generation data sets, IDCAMS does not invoke DFSMShsm. You must then issue the DFSMShsm DELETE command for each of the now-uncataloged migration copies.

I really feel like a JCLM, not sure if some one has faced this already - would like to know what they think, is it a good idea, in real?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8657
Location: Back in jolly old England

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:39 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

A lot of places restict the use of FORCE to storage and sysprog people.

One place they said it was because it focused the mind that you really did want to do this. For me it's not a problem as I have a REXX that will delete all of the generations and then the base definition.

As from a storage view, it is better that there are no uncataloged datasets held in the MCDS, however a HSM audit will highlight these datasets and offer the code to delete the HSM entries. On a downside, an audit can take up to 48 hours to complete.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Thank you, Expat.

that means, using the ‘DELETE GDG FORCE’ command causes migrated GDSs to become uncataloged, but not deleted. This data takes up space and will be billable to the data owners, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8657
Location: Back in jolly old England

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:27 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

That is what it says in the good book. So yes they will be billable if HSM is a billable component for the bean counters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anuj Dhawan

Senior Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6258
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:02 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Fine, Thanks expat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts Need help with 002-030 ABEND in TSO R... Terry Tallian TSO/ISPF 0 Sat Mar 17, 2018 1:13 am
No new posts load and delete table through JCL wit... ram_vizag JCL & VSAM 9 Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:47 am
No new posts OUTREC with ALter Command scorp_rahul23 DFSORT/ICETOOL 1 Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:10 pm
No new posts MQ command in option 6 of ISPF! Vignesh Sid All Other Mainframe Topics 3 Tue Sep 26, 2017 6:01 pm
No new posts How to change a string containing the... chong.zhou TSO/ISPF 6 Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:54 pm

Facebook
Back to Top
 
Job Vacancies | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Polls | Contact Us