Portal | Manuals | References | Downloads | Info | Programs | JCLs | Mainframe wiki | Quick Ref
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBM Mainframe Computers Forums Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Memberlist Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 
Tape vs. DASD - speed/time/CPU utilization difference

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Author Message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:32 pm    Post subject: Tape vs. DASD - speed/time/CPU utilization difference
Reply with quote

Hi,

Will there be any processing speed/time/CPU utilization difference when reading and writing a file in the below given two cases,

1) a tape file
2) a PS file in DASD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2441
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:34 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

What do YOU think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply to: Tape vs. DASD
Reply with quote

I face few processing time difference between them..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2441
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:43 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Like ?

DASD faster or slower compared to tape?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:46 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Ya when i ran a job with file in DASD , it ran faster than when i ran it with tape file as input..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:47 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Is there any way to speed up the read/write process in tape??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2441
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:53 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Fast tape units, blocksize, maybe tapes are mounted manually.

But DASD processing is always faster in normal sequential processing,
but then direct tape processing is (except "stress" testing) never done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:55 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

[quote="PeterHolland"]Fast tape units, blocksize, maybe tapes are mounted manually.

What is it, 'FAST TAPE UNITS' ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterHolland

Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 2441
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Google on 'FAST TAPE UNITS' and you will get lots of answers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaneshMF

New User


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:02 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Thank you!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Dennis

Active Member


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 562
Location: Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:52 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

No tape mount will match DASD allocation speed. The fastest is probably a scratch mount in a virtual tape server (usually < 5 secs.). Next is scratch mount from an auto-loader.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kailas girase

New User


Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 6
Location: New Bombay

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:33 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Tape Data sets not accessible for COBOL programmes, But DASD can be.

Tape is magnetic device, while DASD is optically written data.

I am not sure on above, some clarifications are expected.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Site Director


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19270
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:55 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hello,

Why would you believe that tape datasets cannot be used by COBOL programs? Of course they can. . .

Quote:
Tape is magnetic device, while DASD is optically written data.
And this was posted because . . .?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Sample

Global Moderator


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 8152
Location: East Dubuque, Illinois, USA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:43 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Quote:
Tape Data sets not accessible for COBOL programmes, But DASD can be.

Tape is magnetic device, while DASD is optically written data.
I count at least three mistakes and one clarification in your two lines:
1. Tape data sets are easily accessed by COBOL programs.
2. DASD data sets are also easily accessed by COBOL programs.
3. Tape data is written magnetically, however the device itself is not a magnet -- it is a complicated piece of machinery that accepts electrical impulses from the CPU and translates them into magnetic bits written upon the tape
4. DASD is not optically written. DASD data is magnetic bits written upon a substrate, just like tape data is magnetic bits written upon a substrate. CD and DVD devices are optical but they don't interface much to mainframes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> JCL & VSAM All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Search our Forum:

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts Regarding time parameter shanthi gude JCL & VSAM 7 Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:31 pm
No new posts DSNACCOX (can it be run on 1 db/ts, t... SRICOBSAS DB2 5 Sat May 06, 2017 12:59 am
No new posts Length of Tape file Mohan Kothakota JCL & VSAM 9 Thu Apr 20, 2017 10:24 pm
No new posts LISTIDR compiled date/time jerryte IBM Tools 3 Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:37 pm
No new posts Application not run by time HH:MM tri... jzhardy IBM Tools 1 Sun Apr 09, 2017 3:22 pm

Facebook
Back to Top
 
Job Vacancies | Forum Rules | Bookmarks | Subscriptions | FAQ | Polls | Contact Us