|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Please run a LISTCAT ALL on the data component and post the results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalhor
New User
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 31
Location: iran
|
|
|
|
| I've tryed to delete by NOSCR befor this but it could not be deleted |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| kalhor wrote: |
| I've tryed to delete by NOSCR befor this but it could not be deleted |
Then you are probably not authorised to use the NOSCR parameter, hence my previous suggestion to talk to storage management / sysprogs who should be authorised to use this parameter. This was made quite clear in my previous post.
Anuj - pay attention  I believe that the OP has said that LISTCAT did not work in a previous post. He has also said that this is part of a multi vol dataset where the "main part" (which I would guess being volser 1) is unavailable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kalhor
New User
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 31
Location: iran
|
|
|
|
| No the authority is not my problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
| What have you discovered by reading the messages and codes that have been issued so far ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kalhor
New User
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 31
Location: iran
|
|
|
|
| Nothing more, i think initialize is the last way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi Expat,
What I was thinkng & recall for such problems, normally the file is cataloged in the wrong UCAT requiring LISTC ENT for the HLQ, UCAT and then matching up with entry in VVDS. IBM 'fixed' it eons ago by adding a nocheck if you use the MCAT name for the CAT parameter. . . but. . .
May be other alternative is to use the “Resynchronize ICF Catalog” (FUNC=RE) and specify the ALIASLVL= parameter and CATLGCHK=Y . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales
|
|
|
|
Yeah, after checking out the message codes, that was what I thought about the entry being in a catalog that does not have the alias pointing to it. Usually the master catalog.
Then you have to specify the REAL catalog which has the entry in it in the DELETE NVR parameter. You can also list out the VVDS and see which catalog association is with the NVR entry.
After my last comment, I was rather hoping that the OP might have tried it out and reported back, but hey  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
