IBM Mainframe Forum Index
 
Log In
 
IBM Mainframe Forum Index Mainframe: Search IBM Mainframe Forum: FAQ Register
 

Verification mechanism


IBM Mainframe Forums -> CA Products
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vikash singh

New User


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 15
Location: noida

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:44 pm
Reply with quote

Jobs A, B and C run in following sequence in Ca7:

A -> B -> C (When A is complete, it triggers B. Once B is over it triggers C, also B is a requirement for few other jobs).

B uses an already existing file say FILE1.

We need to put some mechanism that will count the number of records in FILE1. If this count is more than a predefined limit then a notification mail should be sent to the support. The support should find the cause for this increase and if everything looks ok then will continue with processing.

Limitation:
We don’t want to schedule new job(s) in Ca7. Reason: This verification mechanism is needed for lot of jobs.

Solution:
We will modify job B so that it counts the number of records in file FILE1. If this count exceeds the upper limit then it should send a notification mail to support and it abends.

Problem with Solution:
We don’t want B to abend if record count exceeds the limit.
If we design our job such that it doesn’t abend then it will trigger other jobs in Ca7.
We would like job B to go on hold after sending a notification mail.

Please suggest if this is achievable.

Also, please let me know if you have some alternate ideas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dick scherrer

Moderator Emeritus


Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 19244
Location: Inside the Matrix

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:15 pm
Reply with quote

Hello,

If i understand what you want to do, you want to change the way this process works without making a change. . . This Does not seem like a reasonable request icon_confused.gif

You might consider a new pre-processor job that looks at the file and responds accordingly. The current process would remain unchanged.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 8797
Location: Welsh Wales

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:35 pm
Reply with quote

Quote:
We would like job B to go on hold after sending a notification mail.

And possibly hold a partition and stop other jobs from procesing.

As Dick has suggested, look at a global solution for all of the possibly affected processes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vikash singh

New User


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 15
Location: noida

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:35 pm
Reply with quote

Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic View Bookmarks
All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Forum Index -> CA Products

 


Similar Topics
Topic Forum Replies
No new posts Initial Verification Process Checklis... All Other Mainframe Topics 0
No new posts Sortwork and file space allocation me... DFSORT/ICETOOL 28
No new posts "FOR FETCH ONLY" verification DB2 10
No new posts Access verification for the datasets CLIST & REXX 7
No new posts How does DB2 lock mechanism work phys... DB2 1
Search our Forums:

Back to Top