View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
Rupesh.Kothari
Member of the Month
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 463
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me please what id difference between Successor job and trigger job and benefit of each as both are waiting for its predecessor?
Thanks in advance for you help.
Rupesh.Kothari |
|
Back to top |
|
|
priyesh.agrawal
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 1448 Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
|
Successor & Triggered both are the jobs starts execution only on completion of a specified jobs, the difference lies in Successor jobs dont use any output from its predecessor jobs.
One use of successor jobs is in checking that a predecessor has run within a specified number of hours.
Regards,
Priyesh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 435 Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
Successor & Triggered both are the jobs starts execution only on completion of a specified job |
Triggering can be set at the dataset level too.Once the job creates a particular dataset then it will trigger the job.This factor is one of the differentiation that it has with the successor job. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mohankalyan99
New User
Joined: 06 Apr 2005 Posts: 16
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Triggered means once Job A is completed Job is going to trigger.
Successor means Before execution of Job B it checks whether Job A is completed or not.
Let me know if you still have any doubts.
Regards
Kalyan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rupesh.Kothari
Member of the Month
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 463
|
|
|
|
Hi Kalyan,
Thanks for your response.
But in both the case (Triggering and successor) jobs has to wait to complete the predecessor jobs.
Could you please explain me when we can use triggering and when successor as both are same.
Thanks & regards
Rupesh.Kothari |
|
Back to top |
|
|
priyesh.agrawal
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 1448 Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
|
A difference b/w Successor & Triggered Jobs is that, Triggered Job gets start immediately after complition of its earlier job. But It is not a compultion to a successor job, It will get start at Its own time.
Quote: |
But in both the case (Triggering and successor) jobs has to wait to complete the predecessor jobs. |
Yeah, Its correct. In both cases later job waits completion of earlier.
Quote: |
Could you please explain me when we can use triggering and when successor as both are same. |
Suppose, Job A, runs 11:45 AM, needs two dataset to proceed.
One of it, from Job P, which it gets everyday 11:00 AM, other from Job Q, at 11:30 AM. So Job A can be a successor of Job P, but can't be triggered by Job P.
I hope it'll make U clear.
Regards,
Priyesh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|