|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
tu quoque Pedro 
The topic has been resurrected after
| Code: |
... 3 year(s) - (months difference / 12 )
... 3 year(s) - (difference )
... 36 months
... 1095 days
... 26289 hours
... 1577361 minutes
... 94641660 seconds |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pedro
Global Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 2592
Location: Silicon Valley
|
|
|
|
Sorry.
It somehow showed up in the list of recently appended threads. (or something like that). I normally do not look at old stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10886
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
Sorry for what ? I was just pulling Your leg  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
don.leahy
Active Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 765
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if this has been mentioned elsewhere on this board (I couldn't find it in a Search), but IEFBR14 no longer has to HRECALL a migrated data set before deleting it.
Apparently, the new behaviour is in z/OS not IEFBR14 itself; the system intercepts HRECALL requests resulting from IEFBR14 and, if the DISP is DELETE,DELETE, it performs an HDELETE instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Woodger
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 7309
Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Is that an explicit DELETE,DELETE or does it work with (OLD,DELETE)?
That would make IEFBR14 something "special", like a part of the OS rather than a do-nothing program. Kind of hard to describe. Or have they changed IEFBR14 itself to do that? Interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
don.leahy
Active Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 765
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I meant (MOD,DELETE,DELETE). (OLD,DELETE,DELETE) should probably work too. I tend to use the former as it works even if the DSN does not exist.
I understand that they didn't change IEFBR14. It is now treated by the OS as a "special" program. This caused some controversy on IBM-MAIN because it introduces an inconsistency. On the other hand, it is a very useful inconsistency. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6248
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| The enhancement in z/OS 1.11 is that Batch Allocation/Unallocation processing is checking to see if the program name is exactly 'IEFBR14', and if so, for migrated data sets whose DISP is DELETE, it simply HDELETEs them without HRECALLing them. DISP=(*,DELETE) is applicable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steven.daniels
New User
Joined: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 1
Location: United States
|
|
|
|
| I ran with PARM='CSIUTIL SCAN MIGR' to get a listing of datasets that would have been deleted and got no output. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rohit Umarjikar
Global Moderator
Joined: 21 Sep 2010
Posts: 3076
Location: NYC,USA
|
|
|
|
Welcome!
Please avoid tailgating any old posts and start your own new one if you have a specific questions, you can reference this post in your new post if you need to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
