|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
bittu
Warnings : 1
New User
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 19
Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Hi,
What is the exact syntax of the INITIALIZE .. WITH FILLER ?
Thanks, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Probably you are looking for something else, FILLERS are left untouched when INITIALIZEd is used..
May be you wanted to say
| Code: |
| INITIALIZE identifier-1 with REPLACING ALPHABETIC BY 'identifier-2' |
Please clarify your query a bit more.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaru
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 1287
Location: Chennai, India
|
|
|
|
Anuj,
| Quote: |
FILLERS are left untouched when INITIALIZEd is used..
|
Thats true, but you can initialize the fillers using INITIALIZE WITH FILLER option and OP wants the syntax of the same.
Hope I am not wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Aaru,
INITIALIZE "WITH FILLER" is valid with Fujitsu and Micro-Focus COBOL (and others i believe).
I've not seen it with IBM mainframe COBOL compilers & I work on IBM Mainframes, so first guess was that.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bittu
Warnings : 1
New User
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 19
Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Yes. It does not work in IBM Mainframe.
Thanks Aaru and Anuj for your suggetions.
Cheers,
Bittu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Superior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 6250
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi biitu,
Hopefully we had been helpful and you got what you were searching for..Good Luck...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
