|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
priyesh.agrawal
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1448
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
|
Girls and Windows
* Both have a great UI.
* Both consume large resources and do less work.
* Both crash unexpectedly.
* Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
* Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment).
* Both are costly to maintain.
* Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
* Both working often contradicts with their documentation.
* Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they
(viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
* In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked very much.
Boys and Linux
* Both have an average UI.
* Both are robust.
* Both are highly secure.
* Both can be easily modified to support new concepts/features.
* Both are efficient.
* Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter
how low are resources.
* You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open
its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature).
* Both provide large support for development (work environment).
* Both are poorly documented. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
radhakrishnan82
Active User
Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 435
Location: chennai, India
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Boys and Linux
* Both are robust.
* Both are highly secure.
* Both can be easily modified to support new concepts/features.
* Both are efficient.
* Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter
how low are resources.
* You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open
its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature).
* Both provide large support for development (work environment).
* Both are poorly documented. |
A sticky one.Last 2 lines proves to be very sticky.
Thanx priyesh,Its Ultimate! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
