|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Phrzby Phil
Senior Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1042
Location: Richmond, Virginia
|
|
|
|
| Well, if the sender and receiver cannot cooperate, then I certainly give up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superk
Global Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 4652
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
|
|
|
| abin wrote: |
| It is landed as (+1) of a GDG. |
abin, that's a rather EXTREMELY IMPORTANT detail to omit from your original post!!! CONNECT:Direct has to place an enqueue on the entire GDG so it can do its job and properly update a relative generation without contention and/or interference from outside processes. We could've eliminated a lot of the guesses to your post had we known that fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abin
Active User
.jpg)
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 198
|
|
|
|
HI Kevin,
Sorry that I missed that infomation in my original post.
So do we have a solution.
| Quote: |
| CONNECT:Direct has to place an enqueue on the entire GDG so it can do its job and properly update a relative generation without contention and/or interference from outside processes |
What I understand is when a new version of GDG is NDMed, it is catalogued at the begginning and the NDM process keeps an exclusive hold until the process is over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
