View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
sonasheetal
New User
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 27
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
Please calrify the following things.
1) When 'MOVE' takes place in COBOL, Is only value of sending data is considered to be moved to receiving filed?
or
Are both value as well as datatype considered for the MOVE?
Because MOVE '123' to 9(3)
MOVE 123 to X(3) are possible.
but MOVE 'ABC' to 9(3) is not possible.
Please explain bit more.
2) Is this MOVE 123(declared as comp) to X(3) possible?If no Why.
Regards,
Sona. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonasheetal
New User
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 27
|
|
|
|
I undersatand the concepts of move. If you know the answer for my queries, reply with suitable answer else tell me which manual you are refeering. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19244 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
If you click on "Manuals" at the top of the web page, documentation is available for multiple versions of mainframe COBOL. The first group of manuals is COBOL. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phrzby Phil
Senior Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 1042 Location: Richmond, Virginia
|
|
|
|
You can certainly test each of your questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lanand_hps
New User
Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 82 Location: chennai
|
|
|
|
Ya.. Better way to learn is by testing.
The move depends on compiler also.
Most of the times, moves wont give you errors but addition or other manipulation will throw errors.
9(3) to x(3) move is permitted.
9(3) to comp variable move wont give error.
But adding 9(3) to a COMP variable will result in S0C7.
moves in general wont throw errors... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Craq Giegerich
Senior Member
Joined: 19 May 2007 Posts: 1512 Location: Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
lanand_hps wrote: |
Ya.. Better way to learn is by testing.
But adding 9(3) to a COMP variable will result in S0C7.
|
TEST it with a 9(3) field containing valid numeric data! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19244 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Quote: |
But adding 9(3) to a COMP variable will result in S0C7. |
No, it won't - unless the 9(3) field has invalid data.
As Craig suggests - test it with valid data. . . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lanand_hps
New User
Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 82 Location: chennai
|
|
|
|
As Craig suggests - test it with valid data. . .[/quote]
Get a 9(3) as input in the program using ACCEPT statement and test.
It will abend. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Craq Giegerich
Senior Member
Joined: 19 May 2007 Posts: 1512 Location: Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
lanand_hps wrote: |
As Craig suggests - test it with valid data. . . |
Get a 9(3) as input in the program using ACCEPT statement and test.
It will abend.[/quote]
Yes it will fail, if the 9(3) field contains nonnumeric data! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|