|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
/hamlet on
JCLPREP that' s the ******g problem
/hamlet off
|
Jcl scanning tools think they are INTELLIGENT,
but in reality that' s the other way around... they are STUPID...
In jcl is perfectly legal to use a nonexistent pds member
with disp SHR or OLD
looks like JCLstupid is of a different opinion and
this time fouled us in searching inexistent errors
THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY FOR JCL IS MVS...
Run some tests without using JCLstupid and see what happens
Or more seriously ask Your support people to fix the problem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superk
Global Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 4652
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
|
|
|
| The JCL is fine. The PROC is fine. However, I never saw a follow-up post about the SB14 abend being addressed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 10873
Location: italy
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| I never saw a follow-up post about the SB14 abend being addressed. |
OK OK.. I lost it
If I remember correctly "SB14" is a system abend related to
the lack of directory space to write the current member info
Action : recreate the PDS with more directory blocks,
or migrate to PDSE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
