View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
sandiptcs
New User
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 19 Location: amsterdam
|
|
|
|
hello!
Can you provide link to any reference that describes the basic difference between this two calls
I was getting a SOC4 (U4036) when I tried to introduce a simple CEETDLI call with a PSB that was earlier used in a AIBTDLI call
the SOC4 was in a module called CEEBINIT. Any idea !!
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bitneuker
CICS Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 1104 Location: The Netherlands at Hole 19
|
|
|
|
Will explore a bit. Right now the reference (comes from the link in my signature and search for AIBTDLI).
click |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bitneuker
CICS Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 1104 Location: The Netherlands at Hole 19
|
|
|
|
and in the same fine reference CEETDLI
direct pointering a problem? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bitneuker
CICS Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 1104 Location: The Netherlands at Hole 19
|
|
|
|
Used to get a similar abend when I forgot to include IMS during linking.
Code: |
//LKED.SYSIN DD *
INCLUDE IMS(DFSLI000)
ENTRY CEESTART
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|