View previous topic :: View next topic
|
Author |
Message |
dick scherrer
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 19243 Location: Inside the Matrix
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Quote: |
continual hopes for the 'magic bullet' and refusal to answer basic questions |
And there are more and more places that desperately need a magic bullet. Largely because of the incredible mountains of sludge that have been implemented by far less than qualified developers.
And this is on the rise. Several of us (old folks of my acquaintance) have wondered if IBM can make new, more powerful cpus and dasd fast enough to keep up with the monsters that have been created and appear to be growing. . . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enrico-sorichetti
Superior Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 10875 Location: italy
|
|
|
|
looks like the MS syndrome,
why write good software and have competent people
when a more powerful cpu and ibmmainframes.com
will take care of everything
i do not know if or |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pkmurali Warnings : 1 Active User
Joined: 15 Dec 2005 Posts: 271
|
|
|
|
Dick,
My appolgies. I din't ignored your opinion on batch application to replace the online. But I like to know,if there is any possibilty to dig further to utilize any options left in CICS to satisfy my requirement. Thanks Dick,Bill, Enricho for all the inputs given.
Regards,
Murali. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dbzTHEdinosauer
Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 6966 Location: porcelain throne
|
|
|
|
Murali,
without knowing specifics of your app, it is hard to provide suggestions.
you mentioned:
Quote: |
My application is not only used by one system |
sorry, I am not trying to be an asshole, but I don't really know what you mean. Especially since you said
Quote: |
if i suggest for batch,i have to look for Business functions. mostly my client would reject my proposal if i go with batch option. |
My assumption is that this is a legacy system and the client does not want to spend any money upgrading.
For one reason or another, your cics (or are they the clients cics support people) complained about this transaction.
is it really the memory that is a problem? It could be task type switching,
keyword thread safe
Bill O'Boyle is the one to lead that conversation.
reason I bring it up, it that violations of thread-safe result in time-resouces being consumed.
Again, without a complete understanding of this app, we are wasting your time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|